Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Review of the 2015 Defending the Faith Apologetics Conference

Inserting image... 
From Biola University and Stand to Reason in California to CARM in Idaho to Reasonable Faith in Texas – it seems that if you want good Christian Apologetics, you have to go west, young man. The Northeast is unfortunately sparse in resources for the intellectually eager Christian yearning for some depth to help them buoy up in a world which is certain that Christianity equals Nonsense.  
Fortunately for residents of the tri-state area, Mt. Airy Bible Church holds a Defending the Faith conference every October, which features some of the best speakers in the field. This year’s lineup featured J. Warner Wallace, Dr. Paul Copan, and Dr. David Wood. 
Dr. Copan is most famous for his book Is God a Moral Monster, which tackles the many criticisms leveled at the apparently despicable God of the Old Testament. Copan’s speaking style was frank, bemused, and sprinkled puns, drawing out good-natured groans from the audience. 
Copan’s first talk was on Old Testament slavery. Copan pointed out that, if one examines the “slavery” laws, it’s easy to see that they were a form of social welfare: that those who were unable to support themselves could hire themselves as workers to the wealthier landowners. The laws ensured that they would receive proper reciprocation for their labor, protection from abuse, and that when their term of service was complete, they would leave with enough resources to live independently. The laws strictly forbade the selling or purchase of human beings. 
Copan’s second talk looked at the historic difference which Christianity has made. He first examined the mess which Hinduism has made of India as a case study. India is the closest thing in the modern world of what the pre-Christian, pagan world would have looked like. Copan asked “what would it take to change such a mindset?” Somehow, that pagan, pre-Christian world has developed to the liberal world so invested in human interests seen today. Copan argued that this reform was not a result of Grecian Democracy, Roman rule, secular beliefs, or of science, but rather the advance of Christianity. He showed in his lecture how science, indeed, owed its roots to Christianity. Finally, he showed how modern, non-Christian, secular historians acknowledge this very thing. 
The second speaker at the conference was Dr. David Wood, an atheist-turned-Christian-Apologist from New York who spoke with a dynamic energy befitting his youth. Wood’s presentations were less like lectures and more like what one might see at youth conferences: energetic talks for the audience to put into application. 
Wood’s first presentation was on how a Christian should interact with a Muslim. His experience with Muslims, he said, was entirely un-intentional, and came from the gradual conversion of his Muslim best friend, and the aftershock of Muslim response to this conversion. It had since become one of his primary platforms. He spoke of the common objections which Muslims will bring to Christians, such as “Show me where your Jesus says ‘I am God, worship me,’” and “The Bible has been corrupted.” Dr. Wood then showed from the Quran how the Muslims’ criticisms of Christianity backfire against their own religion. 
Dr. Wood’s second presentation was on the “problem of evil.” In this presentation, Dr. Wood did not so much dwell on the arguments and their responses, but rather on what he considered a larger problem: disproportionate skepticism. What Wood argued was that when a skeptic is confronted with a problem – say, the fine tuning of the universe, or the fact that a finite, material universe must have a timeless, immaterial cause – their level of skepticism regarding the sparse answers they have to offer remains fairly low. However, when they present a problem to Christians – such as the problem of evil – no matter what solution the Christian may offer, it does not meet the high bar of skepticism the critic has set. Dr. Wood argued that the skeptic was being disingenuous, and should retain the same level of skepticism for their own arguments that they have for the Christian’s. 
Finally, it was time for J. Warner Wallace to present. While Wallace has been in the Apologetics game for several years, his star rapidly began to rise when he joined Stand to Reason and wrote his first book, Cold Case Christianity. Not only does Wallace have one heck-of-a hook for his ministry – that of a cold case homicide detective looking at the evidence for Christianity from the perspective of, well, a cold case homicide detective – but he is a charismatic speaker who brought with him a multimedia presentation to stake his claim as the star of the show. 
Fittingly, Wallace put on three total presentations, peppering his talks with illustrations from homicides and court cases he had worked, guaranteed to keep the audience’s attention. The first of the presentations was from his first book, and looked at the evidence for the reliability of the gospels by examining the texts of the gospels as he would eye-witness accounts. He then looked at various textual, scholarly and historical proofs that these gospels were dated close to the events they recorded. 
Wallace’s second talk was from his latest book, God’s Crime Scene, which examined the evidence for God. He did this by looking at the universe as he would a crime scene, and then asked the same questions he would of a crime scene: could all of the evidence be explained from within the room, or was there an intruder? 
The kinds of things Wallace looked at were the fact that a finite, material universe must have an ultimate cause, that values such as good, logic and justice must be grounded in something superior to natural causes, and the fact that fine-tuning of the universe for life is best explained through intelligence. 
Wallace’s final talk looked at the evidence for Christ’s resurrection, again, like a police detective. Having established the eye-witness nature of the Gospel accounts in his first talk, Wallace then looked at what they said and at the lives of the apostles, both as recorded by the Gospels, their successors and early historians – to examine whether they acted like co-conspirators in an elaborate plot, or like men whose lives had been changed by a miraculous event. 
The event also featured a Q&A session with the presenters. 
If you live in the Northeast, and have any interest in Christian Apologetics, be sure to check this event out next year at this time. 

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

A Biblical Perspective on Extraterrestrial Life

A Biblical Perspective on Extraterrestrial Life
Since the UFO craze began in the late 40’s and early 50’s, there have been some few prominent Christian ministers and theologians who have ventured to guess at whether or not intelligent biological life exists elsewhere in the universe. Successful world evangelist Billy Graham made some statements affirming his belief in aliens in his book Angels, God’s Secret Agents. Renowned Christian philosopher William Lane Craig speculated that aliens may exist in the August 2008 episode of his “Reasonable Faith” podcast.
On that episode, Dr. Craig made the very relevant point that whether or not aliens, in the classic science fiction meaning of the word, exist has no real bearing on the Christian faith. If little green men should touch down tomorrow on the White House lawn, all the premises of Christianity would hang together just as they did prior.
That said, there is a fairly solid case to be made against the existence of intelligent aliens if one takes the Bible to be truthful.
The first argument comes from the creation account. This is a much debated account both within and outside of Christian circles, but the gist of the account tends to be that the earth is the central focus of creation, with special emphasis on human beings themselves. If this seems unlikely in the vastness of the universe, keep in mind that size does not necessarily equate with significance - as any particle physicist could tell you. This point alone does not make a strong argument against other intelligent life forms in the universe, but when added up with the whole of the argument, it hangs together.
The second point flows out of the first. If taken at face value, the creation account (Genesis chapters one and two) indicates that the world, and the universe around it were created in perfection. This is not the picture given, however, in the book of Romans where Paul says:
“For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation has been groaning together in the pains of childbirth until now.”
What happened between the creation of the Genesis account and this creation of the Romans account that groans in corruption? What happened was a fairly significant event Christians refer to as “The Fall.” This occurrence, in which humans rebelled against God, not only affected human nature but, according to Paul, affected all of creation. In fact, no matter how one views scriptural accounts, it is clear that the entire universe flows from order to entropy in such a way that the entire structure is headed toward an extinction event that scientists call “heat death.” Paul, who could hardly have known about the ins and outs of entropy and heat death in the first century, does a fairly good job of describing just that in the Romans passage. This flow toward entropy, which the Bible attributes to the Fall of Man, would include any poor aliens that happened to be elsewhere in the universe. This hardly seems fair if humans were the ones who rebelled and not the aliens.
In fact, the entire redemptive story is decidedly human focused. God came in human form, died, rose, and ascended to heaven where he will reign for eternity in a human body. In this story human beings appear to get special treatment over and above extra terrestrials.
Finally, scripture makes it fairly clear that all of creation is scheduled to be destroyed (because of its corruption due to The Fall) and replaced by a newly perfect heaven and earth. These hypothetical aliens would presumably be swept away in this fiery holocaust without a second thought.
Now it should be made clear at this point that the Bible certainly does affirm the existence of a sizable number of spiritual beings that are both intelligent and fairly alien to humans, and while these beings have interactions with the physical realm throughout scripture, it would be a stretch to equate them with science fiction aliens. The Bible and the Christian faith don’t seem to leave much room for extra-terrestrials.